Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement¶
JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise
- The structural separation between a system's true state and the observed or measured state, where the difference—noise—arises from instrument precision limits, observer error, random environmental variation, or systematic bias in the measurement apparatus, as JCGM (2008) classifies in the canonical Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement.
This sourceJoint Committee for Guides in Metrology, BIPM. Canonical metrological framework: classifies uncertainty components by source (instrument precision, environmental variation, systematic bias) and by evaluation method (Type A statistical, Type B non-statistical).
- The structural separation between a system's true state and the observed or measured state, where the difference—noise—arises from instrument precision limits, observer error, random environmental variation, or systematic bias in the measurement apparatus, as JCGM (2008) classifies in the canonical Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:eb0122ccf92a · see in the full table