Textualism's Mistake.¶
(2021). Textualism's Mistake. Harvard Law Review, 135(3), 890-911.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Close Reading
- Textualist constitutional and statutory interpretation methodologically inherits from literary close reading via 20-century legal scholarship — the discipline of binding claims to grain-level marks transferred wholesale even as the artefact shifted from poems to statutes.
This sourceDocuments the methodological inheritance of textualism from literary New Criticism's close reading — Salvatore Scalia as the conduit who imparted New Critical close-reading principles to Antonin Scalia, who in turn shaped textualist statutory and constitutional interpretation.
- Textualist constitutional and statutory interpretation methodologically inherits from literary close reading via 20-century legal scholarship — the discipline of binding claims to grain-level marks transferred wholesale even as the artefact shifted from poems to statutes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:eb12ce76f8a7 · see in the full table