Lexical Tie-ins¶
GNU Project. Lexical Tie-ins.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Lexical Scanning and Tokenization
- … of the grammar* by design, so genuine lexical ambiguity — is `a < b > c` two comparisons or a generic instantiation? — cannot be settled at this layer, and forcing it here (the classic "lexer hack" of feeding parser state back into the scanner) quietly couples two stages that were meant to be independent.
This sourceGNU Bison Manual (n.d.). Describes context-dependent lexical analysis as coupling tokenization to parser state and violating clean lexer/parser separation.
- … of the grammar* by design, so genuine lexical ambiguity — is `a < b > c` two comparisons or a generic instantiation? — cannot be settled at this layer, and forcing it here (the classic "lexer hack" of feeding parser state back into the scanner) quietly couples two stages that were meant to be independent.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ec032942afaf · see in the full table