Parker v. Brown¶
(1943). Parker v. Brown.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Parker immunity doctrine
- The doctrine thus turns on attribution: whose competitive decision is this, and what did the State itself decide to replace with regulation?
This sourceOfficial U.S. Reports PDF inspected at https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep317/usrep317341/usrep317341.pdf . The Court construed the Sherman Act's reach and distinguished state-adopted policy from mere state permission for private violations.
- The doctrine thus turns on attribution: whose competitive decision is this, and what did the State itself decide to replace with regulation?
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ec82f51be6ed · see in the full table