Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments.

Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347-369.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1994

Volume

6

Issue

3

Pages

347-369

DOI

10.1006/game.1994.1021

DOI registrant

Elsevier

Link

https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021

Cited from

economics_finance

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Other-Regarding Preferences
  • The dictator game makes this concrete: a proposer given an endowment unilaterally decides how much to transfer to an anonymous recipient with no power to accept, retaliate, or reciprocate, and the own-payoff-only prediction is zero

    This sourceEstablishes the dictator game and its nonzero giving against the own-payoff-only zero-transfer prediction.

Domain-specific

• Dictator Game
  • The standard protocol, established as a control for the ultimatum game (Forsythe, Horowitz, Savin, and Sefton, 1994, building on an earlier version by Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler)

    This sourceIntroduces the dictator game as the no-punishment control against which ultimatum-game generosity is read, and reports its allocation distribution.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:ec9cacde1fa9 · see in the full table