Data Portability and Interoperability: A Primer on Two Policy Tools for Regulation of Digitized Industries¶
Gulati-Gilbert, S., & Seamans, R. (2023). Data Portability and Interoperability: A Primer on Two Policy Tools for Regulation of Digitized Industries: A Primer on Two Policy Tools for Regulation of Digitized Industries.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Monopoly
- The interventions are remarkably portable, and they transfer as a menu attached to the structure. Create a substitute breaks the no-alternative leg — an antitrust spinoff, second sourcing, a plurality of providers, a niche invader, an alternative standard. Force interoperability breaks the substitutability-blocking mechanism — number portability, a connector mandate, API-disclosure regulation, open-banking rules.
This sourceDocuments forced-interoperability and data-portability remedies (including open-banking/API mandates) as competition tools that break the substitutability-blocking mechanism sustaining platform market power.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The Brookings primer supports interoperability and portability mandates (number portability, open-banking APIs) as ways to cut lock-in, but not the substitute-creation menu or the 'menu' framing.
“Regulators may mandate or otherwise incentivize companies of a certain size to interoperate with others.”
- The interventions are remarkably portable, and they transfer as a menu attached to the structure. Create a substitute breaks the no-alternative leg — an antitrust spinoff, second sourcing, a plurality of providers, a niche invader, an alternative standard. Force interoperability breaks the substitutability-blocking mechanism — number portability, a connector mandate, API-disclosure regulation, open-banking rules.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ecc8338d20b3 · see in the full table