Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act¶
United States Congress. (1975). Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Behavior-Conditioned Warranty
- Notably, the warranty cannot simply be voided because the buyer used a third-party part unrelated to the failure — consumer-warranty law forbids that kind of unrelated-lapse denial.
This sourceExplains that a warrantor generally cannot deny coverage solely because a consumer used a third-party part, though damage caused by that part may be excluded.
- Notably, the warranty cannot simply be voided because the buyer used a third-party part unrelated to the failure — consumer-warranty law forbids that kind of unrelated-lapse denial.
- Warranty or Guarantee
- … is that it converts trust into a concrete, enforceable entitlement — the relying party keeps a remedy even if the promise breaks — which is precisely the assurance that reputation and self-binding cannot provide, and it is enforceable through ordinary contract and consumer-protection law rather than mere goodwill.
This sourceEstablishes that a written consumer warranty creates enforceable remedial obligations, including repair, replacement, refund, and civil relief for breach.
- … is that it converts trust into a concrete, enforceable entitlement — the relying party keeps a remedy even if the promise breaks — which is precisely the assurance that reputation and self-binding cannot provide, and it is enforceable through ordinary contract and consumer-protection law rather than mere goodwill.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:ecd45d8c8f2e · see in the full table