Aspects of the Theory of Syntax¶
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
Cited by¶
7 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Arbitrariness of Symbolic Conventions
- ): Cross-cultural research on how children bootstrap vocabulary suggests partial sound-symbolism aids acquisition, yet language learning ultimately requires mastery of arbitrary conventions. Language universals and deep structure (Chomsky 1965
This sourceReformulation of transformational generative grammar distinguishing deep structures (mapped by transformational rules to surface structures) and locating linguistic universals in deep syntactic structure.
- ): Cross-cultural research on how children bootstrap vocabulary suggests partial sound-symbolism aids acquisition, yet language learning ultimately requires mastery of arbitrary conventions. Language universals and deep structure (Chomsky 1965
- Canonical Form
- In linguistics it is deep structure versus surface structure.
This sourceIntroduces the deep-structure versus surface-structure distinction.
- In linguistics it is deep structure versus surface structure.
- Linguistic Universals
- Competing accounts divide into: (a) innatist explanations (Chomsky 1965, 1981.
This sourceForis Publications. Chomsky Aspects Lectures Government Binding Universal Grammar innatist Principles Parameters.
- Generative linguistics: Chomsky 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax and 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding proposed Universal Grammar as an innatist explanation for linguistic structure.
This sourceForis Publications. Chomsky Universal Grammar innatist explanation linguistic structure Principles Parameters.
- T1 — Innate Universal Grammar vs. Functional Explanations. Chomsky's UG (1965, 1981) posits that linguistic universals reflect innate biological endowment — a language-specific cognitive module.
This sourceForis Publications. Chomsky Universal Grammar biological endowment language-specific cognitive module innatist.
- Competing accounts divide into: (a) innatist explanations (Chomsky 1965, 1981.
- Synchronic vs. Diachronic Analysis
- Generative linguistics (Chomsky 1965
This sourceFoundational articulation of transformational generative grammar: deep structures are mapped by transformational rules into surface structures, formalizing language as rule-governed structural transformation.
- Generative linguistics (Chomsky 1965
- Transformation
- Linguistics & translation: Transformational grammar (Chomsky 1965), syntactic rewriting rules, semantic interpretation, machine translation, code-switching, dialect variation, historical language change.
This sourceFoundational articulation of transformational generative grammar: deep structures are mapped by transformational rules into surface structures, formalizing language as rule-governed structural transformation.
- Linguistics & translation: Transformational grammar (Chomsky 1965), syntactic rewriting rules, semantic interpretation, machine translation, code-switching, dialect variation, historical language change.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 7 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ed3483607b7b · see in the full table