A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse¶
Field, Munafò, & Franken. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Attentional Bias
- Using dot-probe and eye-tracking measures, researchers show that people dependent on alcohol, nicotine, or other drugs have their attention captured and held by substance-related images — a lit cigarette, a glass of beer — far more than non-users, and that the strength of this capture tracks self-reported craving and, in some studies, predicts relapse after treatment.
This sourceThe meta-analysis of 68 data sets finding a significant but weak association (r = .19) between attentional bias and self-reported craving, stronger for illicit drugs and for direct eye-movement and ERP measures.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“indicated a significant positive correlation between attentional bias and self-reported craving ( r = .19, 95% ci = 0.15-0.23, z = 9.12, p < .001)”
- Using dot-probe and eye-tracking measures, researchers show that people dependent on alcohol, nicotine, or other drugs have their attention captured and held by substance-related images — a lit cigarette, a glass of beer — far more than non-users, and that the strength of this capture tracks self-reported craving and, in some studies, predicts relapse after treatment.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ed8c19db0df1 · see in the full table