Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1979). Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Collective Licensing Pool
- The guarding discipline is to keep the repertory to genuinely substitutable rights and to subject the blanket rate to independent review, so the convenience of the blanket
This sourceDescribes consent-decree safeguards providing judicial review of reasonable blanket-license fees and preventing ASCAP from insisting on the blanket form.
- The guarding discipline is to keep the repertory to genuinely substitutable rights and to subject the blanket rate to independent review, so the convenience of the blanket
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:edac33f339d2 · see in the full table