Skip to content

Advances in Prospect Theory

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1992
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
297-323
DOI
10.1007/bf00122574
DOI registrant
Springer Nature
Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Cited from
behavioral_economics, economics_finance

Cited by

5 citations across 5 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Loss Aversion
    • Cumulative prospect theory (Tversky-Kahneman 1992)

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      The 1992 Tversky-Kahneman paper is the work that develops and names cumulative prospect theory, exactly as the claim states.

      “We develop a new version of prospect theory that employs cumulative rather than separable decision weights and extends the theory in several respects. This version, called cumulative prospect theory, applies to uncertain as well as to risky prospects with any number of outcomes, and it allows different weighting functions for gains and for losses.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

  • Risk Aversion
    • and its refined version cumulative prospect theory

      This sourceDevelops cumulative prospect theory, using cumulative (rank-dependent) decision weights with separate weighting functions for gains and losses, predicting risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses (the four-fold pattern).

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      The abstract states that cumulative prospect theory is a new, extended version of prospect theory, supporting the claim that it is a refined version.

      “We develop a new version of prospect theory that employs cumulative rather than separable decision weights and extends the theory in several respects. This version, called cumulative prospect theory,”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 4 of 5 citations: 3 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:eeea1b139904 · see in the full table