Skip to content

Winning through innovation.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Winning through innovation.: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal. Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1997
Link
https://archive.org/details/winningthroughin0000tush
Cited from
biology_ecology, futurism_foresight, organizational_management, systems_cybernetics

Cited by

8 citations across 8 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Absorptive Capacity

    • This sourceOn building organizations that win through streams of innovation and managed change. [No stable DOI/edition link located for this chapter; left link-less.]

  • Adaptation
    • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
  • Adaptive Capacity
    • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
  • Ambidexterity (Exploit vs. Explore)
    • What is the disposal mechanism for failed explorations?

      This sourcePractical treatment of how organizations sustain incremental (exploitation) change while simultaneously leading revolutionary (exploration) change, including transitioning and integrating proven innovations into operations — the transition/disposal mechanism for explorations.

  • Diversity

    • This sourceCITATION-FIX (tier-C): the prime mis-cites this as a chapter ('Winning through innovation') 'In Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos'. 'Winning Through Innovation' is a standalone Tushman & O'Reilly 1997 book; 'Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos' is a separate 1998 work by Brown & Eisenhardt. Title/format corrected.

  • System Slack
    • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
  • Three Horizons Analysis
    • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
  • Variation Strategies
    • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 8 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

Registry ID ref:ef5e0b96ee0b · see in the full table