Arguing Safety – A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases¶
Kelly, T. P. (1998). Arguing Safety – A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases: A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Requirements Traceability Check
- It records the whole as a traceability structure
This sourcePresents a graphical assurance structure linking claims to evidence while explicitly showing assumptions and undeveloped goals.
- It records the whole as a traceability structure
- Safety Case
- Argue, don't just list. The claim is decomposed into sub-claims and structured as an argument — often in a notation like Goal Structuring Notation
This sourceStructures a safety case as a hierarchy of claims and subclaims connected by an explicit argument and supported by evidence at the relevant leaves.
- Argue, don't just list. The claim is decomposed into sub-claims and structured as an argument — often in a notation like Goal Structuring Notation
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:f01d257700b5 · see in the full table