Technical note¶
Knoben, W. J. M., & Freer, J. E. (2019). Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Kling–Gupta Efficiency
- A perfect component triple gives KGE = 1; a lower score records departure from that ideal but does not, by itself, identify which component is responsible or declare a model adequate.
This sourceEquations and text/caption were inspected; figure pixels were not independently evaluated.
- A perfect component triple gives KGE = 1; a lower score records departure from that ideal but does not, by itself, identify which component is responsible or declare a model adequate.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:f05840f0ce26 · see in the full table