Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission¶
High Court of Australia. (2000). Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Jurisdictional fact
- If the official action is properly challenged, a court can determine whether the criterion exists rather than treating the administrator's opinion as the legally conclusive condition.
This sourceOfficial judgment PDF; see especially joint reasons [28]–[52] and separate reasons of Gaudron J [53]–[60].
- If the official action is properly challenged, a court can determine whether the criterion exists rather than treating the administrator's opinion as the legally conclusive condition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f08a22d2ac10 · see in the full table