Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling through Verification and Validation¶
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2018). Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling through Verification and Validation: Application to Medical Devices.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Digital-Twin Hazard Rehearsal
- The discipline is to validate the twin against real telemetry or incident data, source scenarios from an independent hazard analysis, and treat a clean run as evidence bounded by fidelity, never as proof.
This sourceTreats model credibility as decision-specific evidence whose required rigor depends on reliance and consequences, rather than as universal proof.
- The discipline is to validate the twin against real telemetry or incident data, source scenarios from an independent hazard analysis, and treat a clean run as evidence bounded by fidelity, never as proof.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f13f392c37a8 · see in the full table