Rule 404 (Character Evidence)¶
Evidence, F. R. o. Rule 404 (Character Evidence).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Relevance Substitution
- in political communication (likeability, partisan-tribal, fear-salience, and patriotism substitution), in legal reasoning (character-evidence rules existing precisely to prevent juror relevance substitution),
This sourceUnited States. Exclude character and unfairly prejudicial evidence precisely to prevent jurors substituting an irrelevant active channel for the relevant one.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Rule 404 and its committee notes support only the legal-reasoning half: character evidence is excluded because it distracts the factfinder from what actually happened.
“It tends to distract the trier of fact from the main question of what actually happened on the particular occasion.”
- in political communication (likeability, partisan-tribal, fear-salience, and patriotism substitution), in legal reasoning (character-evidence rules existing precisely to prevent juror relevance substitution),
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:f1add715454c · see in the full table