Master Data Management

Loshin, D. (2008). Master Data Management. Morgan Kaufmann.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2008

Link

https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123742254/master-data-management

Cited from

art_aesthetics, linguistics_semiotics, systems_cybernetics

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Inconsistent Shared Model
  • Establishing a single source of truth for the shared referent — master-data management, primary-source designation, leader election, authoritative-system designation — removes the symmetric ambiguity by fiat.

    This sourceEstablishes master-data/golden-record designation and a single authoritative system of record as the standard remedy for the same entity being represented inconsistently across systems — the single-source-of-truth intervention.

• Record Reconciliation
  • In customer and identity data, master-data management and patient master indexes reconcile records arriving from heterogeneous source systems into a single canonical identity.

    This sourceStandard reference on MDM/identity resolution reconciling records from heterogeneous source systems into a single canonical identity with match-type and survivorship rules.

• Alias-to-Authority Mapping
  • In master data management, a customer-record system routes every variant capture of a person to one master identity, so that history, contacts, and compliance checks aggregate correctly across channels.

    This sourceMDM routes every variant capture of an entity to one master identity so history, contacts, and compliance aggregate correctly across channels.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:f1be377bc99a · see in the full table