ENFSI Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science¶
European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. (2015). ENFSI Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Bayes Factor
- Crucially, the examiner reports only this ratio; standards from bodies such as the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes explicitly assign the prior odds on guilt, and their combination into a verdict, to the court rather than the scientist
This sourceStates the institutional division the sentence names: the practitioner reports the probability of the findings given the propositions, never the probability of the propositions, which is the court's.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Crucially, the examiner reports only this ratio; standards from bodies such as the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes explicitly assign the prior odds on guilt, and their combination into a verdict, to the court rather than the scientist
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f21f4a17ebd7 · see in the full table