Overconfidence among beginners¶
Sanchez, C., & Dunning, D. (2018). Overconfidence among beginners: Is a little learning a dangerous thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 10-28.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Dunning-Kruger Effect
- The question of how much of the original finding survives this correction remains contested in the literature; the effect is smaller than originally reported but detectable (effect size d ≈ 0.4–0.8) in most rigorous reanalyses.
This sourceThe 'beginner's bubble' studies; cited at D16-110. CITATION-FIX: the prime cited a fabricated title/venue/authors ('Sanchez, C. A., & Dunn, E. W. ... Confidence Calibration in Expertise: The Dunning-Kruger Effect Reconsidered', Applied Cognitive Psychology 32(1):71–78); corrected to the real Sanchez & Dunning 2018 paper. CAVEAT: even corrected, this paper does NOT establish the sentence's specific meta-analytic claim of a residual effect size d ≈ 0.4–0.8 (see prose-overreach flag).
- The question of how much of the original finding survives this correction remains contested in the literature; the effect is smaller than originally reported but detectable (effect size d ≈ 0.4–0.8) in most rigorous reanalyses.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f2a8340424c1 · see in the full table