Skip to content

Two-Sided Matching

Roth, A. E., & Sotomayor, M. A. O. (1990). Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Type
Book
Intellectual base
Review or monograph
Year
1990
DOI registrant
Cambridge University Press
Link
https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol052139015xmatched
Cited from
economics_finance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Two-Sided Matching
    • The defining move is that allocation happens by mutual selection across a bipartite relation rather than by a single clearing price.

      This sourceCanonical monograph defining two-sided matching as price-free bilateral allocation by mutual selection; synthesizes the body of matching theory (recognized by the 2012 Nobel Memorial Prize to Roth and Shapley), the recurrence of the bipartite-plus-stability shape across markets, the reframing of the design question toward stability and strategy-proofness, and the transfer of deferred acceptance across residency, school choice, and kidney exchange.

      Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

      The monograph's own abstract frames two-sided matching as a model of search between two sides (firms/workers, buyers/sellers), supporting the bipartite mutual-selection frame but saying nothing about allocation being price-free.

      “Two-sided matching provides a model of search processes such as those between firms and workers in labor markets or between buyers and sellers in auctions.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:f30e56abcef9 · see in the full table