'Accountability'¶
Mulgan, R. (2000). 'Accountability': An Ever-Expanding Concept?. Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Accountability
- and (3) a mechanism for sanctions, remedy, or correction when performance fails to meet established standards, the dimension Mulgan (2000) emphasizes as distinguishing accountability from mere reporting
This sourceSurveys the conceptual stretching of accountability and reaffirms its core sense of being 'called to account' with the principal able to impose consequences.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Mulgan's abstract gives accountability's core as being externally called to account, but says nothing of sanctions or remedy as what distinguishes it from mere reporting.
“The scope and meaning of ‘accountability’ has been extended in a number of directions well beyond its core sense of being called to account for one’s actions.”
- and (3) a mechanism for sanctions, remedy, or correction when performance fails to meet established standards, the dimension Mulgan (2000) emphasizes as distinguishing accountability from mere reporting
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f31936d22e83 · see in the full table