Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity¶
Nissani, M. (1997). Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research. The Social Science Journal, 34(2), 201-216.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Echo Chamber
- In scientific communities, it is the small, tightly cited subfield where reviewers, journals, and conference programmes share assumptions the field rarely tests, so internal debates flourish while external critique never lands.
This sourceDocuments disciplinary insularity and barriers to outside knowledge, including that errors internal to a discipline are best detected by those familiar with adjacent fields.
- In scientific communities, it is the small, tightly cited subfield where reviewers, journals, and conference programmes share assumptions the field rarely tests, so internal debates flourish while external critique never lands.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f376b8102170 · see in the full table