Complaint¶
Robles v. Domino's Pizza, L. (2016). Complaint.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Perceivable Design
- … applied and the Supreme Court declining review), a blind customer, Guillermo Robles, could not complete an order on Domino's website and mobile app using screen-reading software, because, as his complaint alleged, images and controls lacked the text alternatives and labels needed to convey their meaning non-visually
This sourceAlleges that Domino's website lacked alt-text and had empty links and linked images missing alt-text, and that its iOS app had unlabeled buttons and graphics without alt-text.
- … applied and the Supreme Court declining review), a blind customer, Guillermo Robles, could not complete an order on Domino's website and mobile app using screen-reading software, because, as his complaint alleged, images and controls lacked the text alternatives and labels needed to convey their meaning non-visually
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f379f0d917ac · see in the full table