Comparing is believing¶
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 135-167.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anchoring
- Not simply using reference information. If the anchor is genuinely informative and used proportionally to its informativeness, that is appropriate inference, not anchoring.
This sourceArgues anchoring effects are mediated by hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming rather than mere proportional use of informative anchors.
- Not simply using reference information. If the anchor is genuinely informative and used proportionally to its informativeness, that is appropriate inference, not anchoring.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f3b8748fab22 · see in the full table