SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 189-194.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1996

Volume

189

Issue

194

Pages

189-194

DOI

10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke

DOI registrant

Taylor & Francis

Link

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.1201/9781498710411/usability-evaluation-industry-patrick-jordan-bruce-thomas-ian-mcclelland-bernard-weerdmeester

Cited from

art_aesthetics, cognitive_science, engineering_design, human_computer_interaction, psychology

Cited by

10 citations across 10 artifacts.

Primes

• Accommodation
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Affordance
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Contrast
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Design Prototyping
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Gestalt Principles
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Human-Centered Accommodation
  • The evaluation of accommodation effectiveness through reduction of error rate, increase in task speed, or improvement in user well-being
• Mental Model
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Processing Fluency
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.

Domain-specific

• Cognitive Load
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• User-Centered Design
  • The clarity also exposes the cost of poor user research: a sleek product that users cannot operate, that contradicts their mental models, or that fails in actual use contexts is objectively unsuccessful regardless of its appearance

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 10 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 3 other ways.

• https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke ×3
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228593520_SUS_A_quick_and_dirty_usability_scale ×1
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319394819_SUS_--_a_quick_and_dirty_usability_scale ×1

Registry ID ref:f4bbdca54d8b · see in the full table