World Lexicon of Grammaticalization¶
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Convergent Evolution
- In linguistics, languages with no contact independently develop similar features under similar pressures — tonal systems, grammaticalization pathways, sound shifts — convergent solutions to the shared problem of efficient, learnable communication.
This sourceDocuments recurrent grammaticalization source-target pathways shared independently across genetically unrelated languages — parallel development under shared communicative pressure.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract documents several hundred grammaticalization processes with examples from a variety of languages, supporting recurrent pathways but not contact-independence, tone, sound shift, or an efficiency cause.
“It covers several hundred grammaticalization processes, in each case offering definitions of lexical concepts, suitable examples from a variety of languages, and references to the relevant research literature.”
- In linguistics, languages with no contact independently develop similar features under similar pressures — tonal systems, grammaticalization pathways, sound shifts — convergent solutions to the shared problem of efficient, learnable communication.
- Emergent Formalization (Language)
- The tension remains live in the field.
This sourceA-Z typological lexicon documenting the cross-linguistic source-to-target grammaticalization pathways — supports the 'cross-linguistically supported pathways' claim.
- The tension remains live in the field.
Domain-specific¶
- Semantic Narrowing and Widening
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Semantic Shift
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Unidirectionality Hypothesis
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 5 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:f4e4cc1b44e3 · see in the full table