Precedent in English Law¶
Cross, R., & Harris, J. W. (1991). Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Frame Problem
- Precedent and the doctrine of distinguishing function as a relevance-closure mechanism: most prior holdings persist by default; only those touching the same fact-pattern are re-examined.
This sourceStandard treatise on stare decisis and the doctrine of distinguishing — most prior holdings persist by default and only same-fact-pattern cases are re-examined, the legal relevance-closure mechanism over prior holdings and amended statutes.
- Precedent and the doctrine of distinguishing function as a relevance-closure mechanism: most prior holdings persist by default; only those touching the same fact-pattern are re-examined.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f68e122ec2ef · see in the full table