Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.¶
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. (1965). Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Take-It-or-Leave-It Term Audit
- The discipline that keeps it honest is anchoring on genuine dependency and the absence of alternatives or exit — the substance of an unconscionable contract of adhesion, not the mere fact of one
This sourceTreats absence of meaningful choice and bargaining inequality as grounds for unconscionability even when the customer signed the contract.
- The discipline that keeps it honest is anchoring on genuine dependency and the absence of alternatives or exit — the substance of an unconscionable contract of adhesion, not the mere fact of one
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f72d05514078 · see in the full table