Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 6th edition¶
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 6th edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Innovation Sandbox
- Regulatory design: financial-regulator fintech sandboxes where licensed firms offer novel services to consenting customers under capped exposure; pharmaceutical Phase-I units; drone test corridors. Scientific experimentation: biosafety-level containment laboratories, accelerator interlocks, geographically isolated field stations for invasion-ecology trials.
This sourceDefines the BSL-1 through BSL-4 graded-containment ladder and escape-vector controls.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
BMBL supplies biosafety containment practice — secondary barriers limiting exposure to hazardous agents — for laboratories only; it names no fintech sandbox, Phase-I unit or test corridor.
“The design and construction of the laboratory facility provide a means of secondary containment of hazardous biological agents and toxins. The secondary barriers, together with other biosafety controls, help provide protection of personnel, the surrounding community, and the environment from possible exposure to hazardous biological agents and toxins.”
- Regulatory design: financial-regulator fintech sandboxes where licensed firms offer novel services to consenting customers under capped exposure; pharmaceutical Phase-I units; drone test corridors. Scientific experimentation: biosafety-level containment laboratories, accelerator interlocks, geographically isolated field stations for invasion-ecology trials.
- Sandboxing
- Scientific labs: biosafety levels BSL-1 to BSL-4 are graduated sandboxes whose perimeter, permitted operations, and observability scale with the hazard under study.
This sourceDefines biosafety levels BSL-1 through BSL-4 as graduated containment whose perimeter, permitted operations, and practices scale with the hazard.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
BMBL states biosafety levels are mitigations chosen by risk assessment, with practices, equipment and facility safeguards as the scaling instruments; it does not show BSL-1 to BSL-4 enumerated, nor 'observability' as a scaling dimension.
“The information identified by risk assessment will provide a guide for the selection of appropriate mitigations, including the application of Biosafety Levels and good microbiological practices, safety equipment, and facility safeguards that can help prevent LAIs.”
- Scientific labs: biosafety levels BSL-1 to BSL-4 are graduated sandboxes whose perimeter, permitted operations, and observability scale with the hazard under study.
Domain-specific¶
- Protection Standard
- Civil and structural engineering — the origin, with flood-protection standards (1-in-100/500-year levees), seismic design earthquakes, and bridge load ratings. Cybersecurity — control standards rated to defeat threat actors at specified resource levels, plus fire-vault attack ratings. Service-level agreements — tiered uptime guarantees (99.9% / 99.99% / 99.999%) and response-time commitments rated to a defined demand profile. Public health and biosafety — BSL-1 through BSL-4 containment ratings keyed to pathogen classes, and scenario-rated preparedness plans.
This sourceThe CDC/NIH BMBL 6th edition, the US biosafety manual that documents laboratory containment practice and agent summary statements.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) has served as the cornerstone of biosafety practice in the United States since its initial release in 1984.”
- Civil and structural engineering — the origin, with flood-protection standards (1-in-100/500-year levees), seismic design earthquakes, and bridge load ratings. Cybersecurity — control standards rated to defeat threat actors at specified resource levels, plus fire-vault attack ratings. Service-level agreements — tiered uptime guarantees (99.9% / 99.99% / 99.999%) and response-time commitments rated to a defined demand profile. Public health and biosafety — BSL-1 through BSL-4 containment ratings keyed to pathogen classes, and scenario-rated preparedness plans.
Mechanisms¶
- Lab Containment Space
- The honest failure mode is breach through an unmonitored path — an aerosol nobody sampled for, a contaminated item carried out, a seal that failed silently — abetted by complacency, where a labeled biosafety level
This sourceIdentifies unmonitored aerosols, contaminated materials, and failed containment barriers as routes through which a biosafety enclosure can be breached.
- The honest failure mode is breach through an unmonitored path — an aerosol nobody sampled for, a contaminated item carried out, a seal that failed silently — abetted by complacency, where a labeled biosafety level
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 3 of 4 citations: 3 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:f759e2b897bd · see in the full table