Birdwatch¶
Wojcik, S. (2022). Birdwatch: Crowd Wisdom and Bridging Algorithms can Inform Understanding and Reduce the Spread of Misinformation.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Quote Laundering
- In response, platforms deployed channel-keyed remedies rather than source corrections: context labels linking posts to primary health-authority pages, and crowd-sourced annotations (such as X's Community Notes) that attach missing caveats and provenance directly to a viral claim
This sourceTwitter's Birdwatch (later Community Notes), in which crowd-written notes selected by a bridging algorithm attach context to posts and reduce resharing.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- In response, platforms deployed channel-keyed remedies rather than source corrections: context labels linking posts to primary health-authority pages, and crowd-sourced annotations (such as X's Community Notes) that attach missing caveats and provenance directly to a viral claim
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f7aa748168e7 · see in the full table