Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories¶
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255-280.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Narrative Persuasion
- It separates two states (pre-engagement attitude and post-engagement residue) and names the work that the narrative form does in moving between them, distinct from both the artifact itself and the cognitive update that registers the change, a structural reading Busselle and Bilandzic (2008) develop in their model of narrative comprehension and engagement as the load-bearing mediator between text and effect.
This sourceMental-models account of narrative experience: integrates transportation and identification within a comprehension framework where narrative engagement is the load-bearing mediator between text and downstream effect; distinguishes fictionality, external realism, and narrative realism as the components whose breakdown disrupts engagement.
- It separates two states (pre-engagement attitude and post-engagement residue) and names the work that the narrative form does in moving between them, distinct from both the artifact itself and the cognitive update that registers the change, a structural reading Busselle and Bilandzic (2008) develop in their model of narrative comprehension and engagement as the load-bearing mediator between text and effect.
Domain-specific¶
- Suspension of Disbelief
- Violating rules the work itself established can break participation rather than demand further suspension.
This sourceDistinguishes fictionality, external realism, and narrative realism.
- Violating rules the work itself established can break participation rather than demand further suspension.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f9e5c17a4774 · see in the full table