How Uncertain Are Solar Neutrino Predictions?¶
Bahcall, J. N., Basu, S., & Pinsonneault, M. H. (1998). How Uncertain Are Solar Neutrino Predictions?. Physics Letters B, 433(1), 1-2.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Calibration Anomaly
- Demographic and macroeconomic forecasts diverge systematically from realised rates by enough to invalidate model classes, machine-learning scaling laws miss measured loss at new compute levels, galaxy rotation curves diverge from Newtonian prediction (historically motivating dark matter), and the solar neutrino flux fell short of prediction by a factor of three for decades.
This sourceArgues helioseismology confirms the standard solar model, so the long-standing factor-of-several solar-neutrino shortfall cannot be blamed on model inadequacy.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Bahcall et al. support only the solar-neutrino shortfall: chlorine measured 2.55 SNU versus ~7.7 SNU predicted, with the prediction stable over thirty years.
“The theoretical predictions in Table 1 disagree with the observed ne utrino event rates, which are [6]: 2.55±0.25 SNU (chlorine)”
- Demographic and macroeconomic forecasts diverge systematically from realised rates by enough to invalidate model classes, machine-learning scaling laws miss measured loss at new compute levels, galaxy rotation curves diverge from Newtonian prediction (historically motivating dark matter), and the solar neutrino flux fell short of prediction by a factor of three for decades.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:f9f61f4cf2e1 · see in the full table