TC 25-20¶
Army, U. S. (1993). TC 25-20: A Leader's Guide to After-Action Reviews.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Operational Period
- The prime's structural interventions transfer directly, because the same three roles — period length, within-period commitment, boundary ritual — recur across every substrate. Period-length tuning is a recognisable move everywhere: shortening a sprint to recover responsiveness, lengthening an OKR cycle to admit longer-horizon work, matching watch length to fatigue curves, matching meeting cadence to information-arrival rate. Boundary- ritual design transfers as a family: the agile retrospective, the incident- command planning meeting, the central-bank statement, the structured shift signout, and the military after-action review are all boundary rituals performing the identical structural function of converting within-period observations into between-period revision.
This sourceDefines the After-Action Review as a structured boundary ritual that converts within-period observation (what happened and why) into revision for the next iteration of the task.
- The prime's structural interventions transfer directly, because the same three roles — period length, within-period commitment, boundary ritual — recur across every substrate. Period-length tuning is a recognisable move everywhere: shortening a sprint to recover responsiveness, lengthening an OKR cycle to admit longer-horizon work, matching watch length to fatigue curves, matching meeting cadence to information-arrival rate. Boundary- ritual design transfers as a family: the agile retrospective, the incident- command planning meeting, the central-bank statement, the structured shift signout, and the military after-action review are all boundary rituals performing the identical structural function of converting within-period observations into between-period revision.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fade4e90d57e · see in the full table