Mandatory vaccination¶
Pierik, R. (2018). Mandatory vaccination: An unqualified defense. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Mandatory vs. Default Norms
- Calabresi and Melamed (1972), in their classic taxonomy of property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules, treat the strongest form of entrenchment—inalienability—as a distinct legal category that places certain entitlements beyond consensual exchange entirely; Pierik (2018) applies this framing to mandatory-vaccination policy, examining when public-health rationales justify shifting from default-recommended to legally mandated immunization regimes.
This sourceApplies the inalienability/mandatory framing to public-health policy, arguing for the conditions under which states are justified in shifting from default-recommended to legally mandated immunization regimes.
- Calabresi and Melamed (1972), in their classic taxonomy of property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules, treat the strongest form of entrenchment—inalienability—as a distinct legal category that places certain entitlements beyond consensual exchange entirely; Pierik (2018) applies this framing to mandatory-vaccination policy, examining when public-health rationales justify shifting from default-recommended to legally mandated immunization regimes.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fb13eaad1f42 · see in the full table