A survey of web cache replacement strategies¶
Podlipnig, S., & Böszörmenyi, L. (2003). A survey of web cache replacement strategies. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(4), 374-398.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Caching
- The replacement policy (LRU, LFU, FIFO, clock, or application-specific) governing eviction on capacity pressure
This sourceSurveys and classifies cache replacement policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, clock, and application-specific strategies) that govern eviction under capacity pressure.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract confirms replacement strategy is a key cache performance factor and that many competing policies exist, but it names no specific algorithm, so the LRU/LFU/FIFO/clock enumeration is not evidenced here.
“One important performance factor of Web caches is the replacement strategy. Due to specific characteristics of the World Wide Web, there exist a huge number of proposals for cache replacement. This article proposes a classification for these proposals that subsumes prior classifications.”
- The replacement policy (LRU, LFU, FIFO, clock, or application-specific) governing eviction on capacity pressure
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fbe83edfc31d · see in the full table