Handbook of Biometric Anti-Spoofing¶
Marcel. (2019). Handbook of Biometric Anti-Spoofing: Presentation Attack Detection. Springer.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Input Manipulation Attack
- . Prompt injection — instructions embedded in user input, retrieved documents, or email content consumed by an LLM-based agent, redirecting its behaviour through the data channel. Prompt jailbreaks — input phrasings that cross the policy boundary of a safety-filtered language model to elicit restricted output. Biometric presentation attacks — replayed photos, video, 3D-printed masks, or synthesised voice defeating face, iris, fingerprint, or speaker-verification systems, often passing liveness checks
This sourceHandbook surveying biometric presentation-attack detection across face, fingerprint, iris and voice recognition, including 3D facial masks and liveness-detection research.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“spanning biometrics systems based on face, fingerprint, iris, voice, vein, and signature recognition”
- . Prompt injection — instructions embedded in user input, retrieved documents, or email content consumed by an LLM-based agent, redirecting its behaviour through the data channel. Prompt jailbreaks — input phrasings that cross the policy boundary of a safety-filtered language model to elicit restricted output. Biometric presentation attacks — replayed photos, video, 3D-printed masks, or synthesised voice defeating face, iris, fingerprint, or speaker-verification systems, often passing liveness checks
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fc988088848b · see in the full table