An end to shadow banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation¶
Leerssen, P. (2023). An end to shadow banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation. Computer Law & Security Review, 48.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Streisand Effect
- The platform design fix is silent down-ranking rather than publicized removal — reducing the coupling between the enforcement act and its signal.
This sourceDistinguishes visible content removal from undetectable visibility-reduction (down-ranking/shadow-banning), establishing that the publicity of an enforcement action is a design variable — supporting that publicized removal recruits attention while silent down-ranking does not.
- The platform design fix is silent down-ranking rather than publicized removal — reducing the coupling between the enforcement act and its signal.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fc9b1e5de546 · see in the full table