Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of the Overtraining Syndrome¶
Meeusen, R., Duclos, M., Foster, C., Fry, A., Gleeson, M., Nieman, D., Raglin, J., et al. (2013). Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of the Overtraining Syndrome: Joint Consensus Statement of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). European Journal of Sport Science, 13(1), 1-24.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Testosterone-to-Cortisol Ratio
- Later reviews caution that no single resting hormone or ratio reliably diagnoses the syndrome and that responses vary by protocol and state
This sourceThe joint ECSS/ACSM consensus statement, which holds that none of the markers in use - hormones and ratios among them - meets the criteria for generally accepted diagnostic use, leaving overtraining syndrome a diagnosis of exclusion.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Later reviews caution that no single resting hormone or ratio reliably diagnoses the syndrome and that responses vary by protocol and state
Mechanisms¶
- Progressive Overload Protocol
- Adaptation is not linear, and impatience or ego pushes the dose past what recovery can absorb, tipping into overtraining or injury — the very ruin the archetype exists to cap.
This sourceDistinguishes adaptive overload followed by recovery from excessive overload with inadequate recovery, which can lead to prolonged maladaptation and overtraining syndrome.
- Adaptation is not linear, and impatience or ego pushes the dose past what recovery can absorb, tipping into overtraining or injury — the very ruin the archetype exists to cap.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:fcb3b66e4fd9 · see in the full table