Using thematic analysis in psychology¶
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Domain-specific¶
- Thematic Analysis
- Codified by Braun and Clarke (2006, with major revisions in 2019 and 2021) as a six-phase procedure — familiarisation with the data, initial coding, theme generation, theme review, theme definition and naming, write-up — it is among the most widely used qualitative methods across psychology, education, health-services research, organisational studies, and policy evaluation
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Thematic analysis is a poorly demarcated, rarely acknowledged, yet widely used qualitative analytic method within psychology.”
- Codified by Braun and Clarke (2006, with major revisions in 2019 and 2021) as a six-phase procedure — familiarisation with the data, initial coding, theme generation, theme review, theme definition and naming, write-up — it is among the most widely used qualitative methods across psychology, education, health-services research, organisational studies, and policy evaluation
- Theme Reification
- Braun and Clarke, in their work on reflexive thematic analysis, target exactly this slip: they reject the ubiquitous phrase "themes emerged from the data," insisting themes are actively constructed by the analyst, not discovered lying in the corpus
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“We outline what thematic analysis is, locating it in relation to other qualitative analytic methods that search for themes or patterns”
- Braun and Clarke, in their work on reflexive thematic analysis, target exactly this slip: they reject the ubiquitous phrase "themes emerged from the data," insisting themes are actively constructed by the analyst, not discovered lying in the corpus
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fce5120e0062 · see in the full table