Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures¶
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U. S. C. S. C., Labor, U. S. D. o., & Justice, U. S. D. o. (1978). Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
Mechanisms¶
- Fairness Audit by Stratum
- A concrete guard is a bright-line screen like the four-fifths rule — treat any group's selection rate below roughly four-fifths of the top group's as presumptive adverse impact worth investigating — used as a tripwire, not a hall pass.
This sourceUses the four-fifths ratio as a practical screening rule for adverse impact while requiring consideration of other relevant evidence.
- A concrete guard is a bright-line screen like the four-fifths rule — treat any group's selection rate below roughly four-fifths of the top group's as presumptive adverse impact worth investigating — used as a tripwire, not a hall pass.
- Fairness or Bias Audit
- It operationalizes the legal notion of disparate impact: a practice can be discriminatory in effect even when it is neutral on its face, and the classic screen is whether a group's selection rate falls below four-fifths
This sourceSpecifies the four-fifths selection-rate screen against the group with the highest selection rate.
- It operationalizes the legal notion of disparate impact: a practice can be discriminatory in effect even when it is neutral on its face, and the classic screen is whether a group's selection rate falls below four-fifths
- Filter Rationale Register
- The discipline that guards against this is to hold each registered rationale against the filter's actual outcomes — what it really excludes — and against an explicit legitimacy standard, instead of accepting the prose at face value.
This source29 C.F.R. Part 1607. Requires users to examine selection outcomes for adverse impact and to justify exclusionary procedures with evidence of job-related validity or business necessity.
- The discipline that guards against this is to hold each registered rationale against the filter's actual outcomes — what it really excludes — and against an explicit legitimacy standard, instead of accepting the prose at face value.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:fd3d11c1a84a · see in the full table