A model for assessment of weather forecasts¶
Mason. (1982). A model for assessment of weather forecasts. Australian Meteorological Magazine.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Receiver Operating Characteristic
- Machine-learning classification — the routine evaluation plot for a binary classifier built on a continuous score; AUC is reported alongside or instead of threshold-dependent accuracy. Credit scoring and fraud detection — ranking competing scoring models by their power to order risky from safe cases, independent of any one decision cutoff. Probabilistic weather forecasting — the "relative operating characteristic" verifies a will-it-rain forecast by sweeping the probability threshold at which a warning is issued.
This sourceThe weather-forecast verification model built on the relative operating characteristic, charting hit rate against false alarm rate as the decision criterion moves, for forecasts given as probabilities or yes/no.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“can be evaluated for forecasts expressed in yes/no form, as ratings of risk (e.g. low, moderate, high) or explicitly as probabilities”
- Machine-learning classification — the routine evaluation plot for a binary classifier built on a continuous score; AUC is reported alongside or instead of threshold-dependent accuracy. Credit scoring and fraud detection — ranking competing scoring models by their power to order risky from safe cases, independent of any one decision cutoff. Probabilistic weather forecasting — the "relative operating characteristic" verifies a will-it-rain forecast by sweeping the probability threshold at which a warning is issued.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fd5879526324 · see in the full table