Maladaptation¶
Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Risk Transfer Without Reduction
- The levee-building literature formalises this as the "levees-beget-levees" dynamic; European flood policy recognises it as the Polder paradox; and it recurs with different vocabulary in cool-roof investments concentrated in wealthier urban neighbourhoods, wildfire fuel breaks that displace ignition to adjacent unprotected interfaces, pollution-facility relocations across regulatory jurisdictions, and subsidised disaster insurance that transfers accumulated loss from homeowners to public balance sheets without reducing the exposure that produces the loss
This sourceEstablishes maladaptation as a named category -- adaptation that reduces one group's vulnerability while increasing that of other systems, sectors or social groups, including by disproportionately burdening the most vulnerable -- without supplying the levees-beget-levees or Polder-paradox vocabulary or the individual domain cases.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The levee-building literature formalises this as the "levees-beget-levees" dynamic; European flood policy recognises it as the Polder paradox; and it recurs with different vocabulary in cool-roof investments concentrated in wealthier urban neighbourhoods, wildfire fuel breaks that displace ignition to adjacent unprotected interfaces, pollution-facility relocations across regulatory jurisdictions, and subsidised disaster insurance that transfers accumulated loss from homeowners to public balance sheets without reducing the exposure that produces the loss
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fd7e774d1b07 · see in the full table