Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I¶
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Figure-Ground
- Linguistics: Topic-comment and trajector-landmark structure, in which one entity is profiled against a backgrounded reference; in cognitive grammar the relation is treated explicitly as a linguistic analogue of perceptual figure-ground organization.
This sourceFoundational cognitive-grammar text in which trajector/landmark and profile/base are treated explicitly as the linguistic manifestation of perceptual figure-ground organization, with the profiled (trajector) entity as figure against a backgrounded landmark.
- Linguistics: Topic-comment and trajector-landmark structure, in which one entity is profiled against a backgrounded reference; in cognitive grammar the relation is treated explicitly as a linguistic analogue of perceptual figure-ground organization.
- Polysemy
- The structural model also embodies the conventional polysemy patterns — regular semantic extensions that recur across languages and lexical fields — and the systematic-vs-irregular polysemy distinction that separates productive, rule-governed sense extensions from idiosyncratic historical residues
This sourceFoundational cognitive-grammar text in which trajector/landmark and profile/base are treated explicitly as the linguistic manifestation of perceptual figure-ground organization, with the profiled (trajector) entity as figure against a backgrounded landmark.
- The structural model also embodies the conventional polysemy patterns — regular semantic extensions that recur across languages and lexical fields — and the systematic-vs-irregular polysemy distinction that separates productive, rule-governed sense extensions from idiosyncratic historical residues
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fd8b8f322214 · see in the full table