The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry¶
Pocock, J. G. A. (1962). The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry: A Methodological Enquiry. Philosophy, Politics and Society.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Presentism
- Historiographical critique (presentism as a named failure mode in professional practice), teaching of history (pedagogical attention to avoiding presentism), cultural criticism (evaluation of historical art, literature, and figures), biography, legal interpretation (originalism vs. living-constitutionalism debates engage presentist questions), philosophy of history, anthropology (where the parallel error is ethnocentrism — see #197), cross-cultural business and negotiation, and engineering archaeology (evaluating legacy systems against present-day architectural norms).
This sourceDevelops the concept of "historical languages" — the conceptual vocabularies available to past actors — as the proper unit of recovery for political thought.
- Historiographical critique (presentism as a named failure mode in professional practice), teaching of history (pedagogical attention to avoiding presentism), cultural criticism (evaluation of historical art, literature, and figures), biography, legal interpretation (originalism vs. living-constitutionalism debates engage presentist questions), philosophy of history, anthropology (where the parallel error is ethnocentrism — see #197), cross-cultural business and negotiation, and engineering archaeology (evaluating legacy systems against present-day architectural norms).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fde106c0cc51 · see in the full table