Exploring Internal Stickiness¶
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 27-43.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Absorptive Capacity
- The codification and retention mechanisms (documentation, knowledge bases, procedures, training) that preserve and propagate newly assimilated knowledge across the system
This sourceEmpirical study (271 observations of 122 transfers in 8 firms) showing the major barriers to internal knowledge transfer are knowledge-related — the recipient's lack of absorptive capacity, causal ambiguity, and an arduous source–recipient relationship — rather than purely motivational.
- The codification and retention mechanisms (documentation, knowledge bases, procedures, training) that preserve and propagate newly assimilated knowledge across the system
- Adaptive Capacity
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Arbitrage (Generalized)
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:fe26d3a1d5dc · see in the full table