Treatment of Phonological Disability Using the Method of Meaningful Minimal Contrast¶

Weiner, F. F. (1981). Treatment of Phonological Disability Using the Method of Meaningful Minimal Contrast: Two Case Studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 97-103.

Type: Journal article
Intellectual base: Primary research
Year: 1981
Pages: 97-103
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4601.97
DOI registrant: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Link: https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/jshd.4601.97
Cited from: linguistics_semiotics

Cited by¶

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes¶

Minimal Pairs
- Phonology and speech pathology. Phonemic contrast tests (/ship/ vs. /sip/); minimal-pair therapy for articulation disorders, where a client who collapses a contrast is trained to produce and distinguish it.
  This sourceOriginating clinical application of minimal-pair contrast therapy for phonological disorders; reduced targeted phonological processes and generalized to untreated words.
  
  Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
  
  Abstract reports minimal-contrast treatment reduced final-consonant deletion, stopping and velar fronting in two children with phonological disability; it does not cover articulation disorders or contrast testing.
  
  “The results of a treatment procedure using meaningful minimal contrasts are reported. The procedure was successful in reducing the frequency of the following processes: final consonant deletion, stopping of fricatives, and fronting of velars, which were exhibited in the speech of two children with phonological disability.”
  From the publisher's abstract.
  
  Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification¶

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:ff50a24dca67 · see in the full table