Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training¶
Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training. Academic Medicine, 89(3), 387-392.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Simulation Replay
- Its defining limitation is the fidelity gap: a simulation is not the real thing, and judgment that holds in the trainer can fail when real stakes, fatigue, and consequence return — so a rule "validated" only in simulation carries a hidden asterisk.
This sourceDistinguishes surface resemblance from functional correspondence and transfer, showing why performance in a simulation does not by itself validate performance in the applied setting.
- Its defining limitation is the fidelity gap: a simulation is not the real thing, and judgment that holds in the trainer can fail when real stakes, fatigue, and consequence return — so a rule "validated" only in simulation carries a hidden asterisk.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ff7d0e22a35c · see in the full table