How to remain neutral¶
Rachman, S., Shafran, R., Mitchell, D., Trant, J., & Teachman, B. (1996). How to remain neutral: an experimental analysis of neutralization. Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Thought–Action Fusion
- Distress, guilt, checking, reassurance, neutralization, suppression, and prayer can be contexts or possible responses; none must occur for the thought-to-event or thought-to-act relation to be present.
This sourceMixed-variant TAF-prone undergraduate sample; likelihood-other item and group correlation are distinct from the neutralization/delay comparison.
- Distress, guilt, checking, reassurance, neutralization, suppression, and prayer can be contexts or possible responses; none must occur for the thought-to-event or thought-to-act relation to be present.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ffacbd82df77 · see in the full table