Pragmatics of Human Communication¶
Paul, W., Helmick, B. J., & D., J. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Livelock
- Negotiation and conflict — parties stay at the table, each concession triggering a compensating concession, with no joint movement on the underlying issue; the interlocking "dance" in which both work hard at resolution while perpetuating the conflict.
This sourceSymmetrical escalation and the self-perpetuating 'vicious cycle' of reciprocal interaction, where each party's move triggers a compensating move and the relationship makes no progress on the underlying issue.
- Negotiation and conflict — parties stay at the table, each concession triggering a compensating concession, with no joint movement on the underlying issue; the interlocking "dance" in which both work hard at resolution while perpetuating the conflict.
Domain-specific¶
- Interpersonal Communication
- The defining demonstration is Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson's treatment of the content/relational distinction in Pragmatics of Human Communication (1967), the Palo Alto group's synthesis of Bateson's work
This sourceThe Palo Alto group's synthesis, and the standard reference for the content/relationship axiom — that every communication conveys content and simultaneously classifies the relationship in which it is offered.
SupportedVerified against the source
- The defining demonstration is Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson's treatment of the content/relational distinction in Pragmatics of Human Communication (1967), the Palo Alto group's synthesis of Bateson's work
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ffd079f359e6 · see in the full table